Considerations for Inspiring a Love for Science/Outdoor for All

What experiences in your background led you to want to spend time “doing” science or being outdoors and wanting to protect the natural world?  Who helped inspire you?

This fall I took a class on public engagement in science with Dr. Bruce Lewenstein at Cornell.  My interests are in studying ways to build a more diverse audience for youth and family science/outdoor activities.  Literature on inclusive science communication points to engaging audiences before creating experiences, addressing language barriers, ensuring that the intended diverse audience is not sought as a token, and transforming organizations to be inclusive (see references below).  And theoretical frameworks about learning like the Cultural Learning Pathway Framework (Bricker et al., 2008, Bricker & Bell, 2014) note that learning happens in informal/at home spaces throughout life, which if acknowledged that not all learning is formal or even nonformal like youth organization work, could be a key for designing experiences meaningful for  more audiences.   While I was working on the literature review for the topic, John Bowe, our colleague from CCE Warren County, suggested that I read Black & Brown Faces in America’s Wild Places.  The book put many of the ideas and theories into perspective.

Black & Brown Faces in America’s Wild Places was written by professional photographer, Dudley Edmondson to help people of color to see other people of color that have chosen a path to explore, enjoy, protect, and work in the outdoors.  The book consists of 20 interviews, framed similarly – including questions about memorable moments in childhood experiences related to nature, mentors and heroes, and minorities in wild places.  While the interviews were not completed or published as research, they provided an opportunity to better consider how life experiences and the cultural fabric of one’s upbringing can shape interests, decisions, and in some cases, career choices.

The interviews revealed a strong connection between situated learning experiences, interest preferences, influential people, and places.  Notably all interviewees talked about informal experiences in their upbringing being significant determinants in what they chose to study or do.  Of interest, camping with family or friends was the most frequently noted activity that influenced an interest in the outdoors.  Reading books and time with family were the next most frequent activities.  Help on the family farm was another frequent  activity – which often referred to visiting grandparents, or other family – so a novel but not regular farm experience.  Outdoor play, travel, hunting/fishing, and hiking were the next most mentioned experiences.  Travel was noted by several interviewees – including family military experiences, or vacations or day trips.  While two interviewees talked about influential teachers, over half did not mention their formal K-12 education related to influencing their interests in nature and the outdoors.  In terms of non-formal experiences, three interviewees talked about scouting, and four mentioned camps as having an influence.

In terms of influencers – fathers, mothers, and grandparents were most often cited as being heroes or mentors, with famous people including historic figures, writers and actors also playing a significant role in encouraging outdoor exploration.  Historic figures provided role models and heroes to role play to some degree.

The interviews also provided some insights into how the interviewees feel about being people of color in careers and interests that are centered in the outdoors.  Most mentioned wanting to see more black and brown faces, like their own, in national parks, on committees, and engaged with environmental work. This reflection is consistent with inclusive science communication research pointing to humans wanting to see others that look like themselves as role models and participants in order to be more comfortable or feel motivated to try.  Interviewees indicated that they assume that the factors that keep African American audiences from being more present in outdoor adventures include fear of racism while alone in the wild, lack of previous experiences, and lack of resources like transportation.  Several of the interviewees are working on mentoring and leadership programs for black and brown youth to help provide resources, experiences, and connections with other more experienced adventurers.  Woven into the reflections about who participates, the majority of the interviewees talked about the restorative power of nature .  Interviewees shared how time in nature made them feel whole and many suggested that others could benefit from outdoor experiences.

Reflecting on the book and readings left me thinking a lot about what experiences that we, in Extension, create for our youth and families.  In what ways are we allowing for play, creativity, and experiences that value the people that we are serving?  When I think about what inspired me as a young person – it also happened at home, very informally – fishing with a neighbor, hiking a family friend’s rural land, building lean-tos and forts…practicing behaviors for things that were yet to come.  When I think about programs I’ve designed…they have been more formal than informal and perhaps for my goals and not my audience’s needs.  The reflections on the book and the literature review were certainly eye-opening about my own practices and experiences.

If you are interested in seeing the paper and lit review about this topics, let me know – I’m happy to share and would love to discuss.  My program design work intended to be inclusive continues to be a work in progress.

Selected References:

Banks, J. A., Au, K. H., Ball, A. F., Bell, P., Gordon, E. W., Gutiérrez, K. D., Heath, S. B., Lee, C. D., Lee, Y., Mahiri, J., Nasir, N. S., Valdés, G., & Zhou, M. (2007) Learning In and out of school in diverse environments. 40. https://education.uw.edu/cme/LIFE

Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2014a). “What comes to mind when you think of science? The perfumery!”: Documenting science-related cultural learning pathways across contexts and timescales. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 260–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21134

Canfield, K., & Menezes, S. (2020). The State of Inclusive Science Communication: A Landscape Study. 78.

Dawson, E. (2014). Reframing social exclusion from science communication: Moving away from ‘barriers’ towards a more complex perspective. Journal of Science Communication, 13(02), C02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13020302

Edmondson, D. (2006). Black & brown faces in America’s wild places. Adventure Publications.

Research partnership supports NYS families fighting opioids | Cornell Chronicle

Sometimes the media shares great examples of research and extension connecting and Extension extending…

Just in case you missed this article which focuses on the important work the Opioid PWT co-chairs Anna Steinkraus, Juliana Garcia, and Dr. Elizabeth Day have been working on for the last couple years.

Congrats to their team! We just wanted to share. Research partnership supports NYS families fighting opioids | Cornell Chronicle

ESP + 5-H’er Picnic Scheduled for Aug 10, 2021

Hopefully you are all doingMyers Park, Lansing well and your lives are beginning to return to a somewhat more normal existence.  It’s been great to gradually get out to see friends and family that we haven’t seen in person in over a year and getting all of us ESP members and 5-H’ers together this summer is on my mind.  We have reserved our usual pavilion at Myers Landing Park in Lansing for Tuesday, August 10 at noon.  I’ll send more details as we get closer to the date, but for now, save the date!  Looking forward to a good day with good friends.  (Written by Tom Dumas, Lead 5-H’er and friend to ESP)

Research Published on Zoom Fatigue – Causes and Fixes

It might make you knowingly nod to hear that researchers have proven that Zoom fatigue is a real thing.   While I’m not suggesting that we don’t Zoom – frankly, Zoom saved our programs this last year – I am suggesting that we take note of known problems and solutions as we teach, learn, and connect.

Prompted by the recent boom in videoconferencing, communication Professor Jeremy Bailenson, founding director of the Stanford Virtual Human Interaction Lab (VHIL), examined the psychological consequences of spending hours per day on these platforms.  The full article is here.  A summary can be found below:

1) Excessive amounts of close-up eye contact is highly intense.  Turns out that when someone’s face is that close to ours in real life, our brains interpret it as an intense situation.

Solution: Until the platforms change their interface, Bailenson recommends taking Zoom out of the full-screen option and reducing the size of the Zoom window relative to the monitor to minimize face size, and to use an external keyboard to allow an increase in the personal space bubble between oneself and the grid.

2) Seeing yourself during video chats constantly in real-time is fatiguing.

Most video platforms show a square of what you look like on camera during a chat.   Studies indicate that when you see a reflection of yourself, you are more critical of yourself. Many of us are now seeing ourselves on video chats for many hours every day. 

Solution: Bailenson recommends that platforms change the default practice of beaming the video to both self and others, when it only needs to be sent to others. In the meantime, users should use the “hide self-view” button, which one can access by right-clicking their own photo, once they see their face is framed properly in the video.

 

3) Video chats dramatically reduce our usual mobility.

In-person and audio phone conversations allow humans to walk around and move.  “There’s a growing research now that says when people are moving, they’re performing better cognitively,” Bailenson said.

Solution: Bailenson recommends people think more about the room they’re videoconferencing in, where the camera is positioned and whether things like an external keyboard can help create distance or flexibility. For example, an external camera farther away from the screen will allow you to pace and doodle in virtual meetings just like we do in real ones. And of course, turning one’s video off periodically during meetings is a good ground rule to set for groups, just to give oneself a brief nonverbal rest.

4) The cognitive load is much higher in video chats.

Bailenson notes that in regular face-to-face interaction, nonverbal communication is quite natural and each of us naturally makes and interprets gestures and nonverbal cues subconsciously. But in video chats, we have to work harder to send and receive signals.  For example,  if you want to show someone that you are agreeing with them, you have to do an exaggerated nod or put your thumbs up. That adds cognitive load as you’re using mental calories in order to communicate.”

Solution: During long stretches of meetings, give yourself an “audio only” break. “This is not simply you turning off your camera to take a break from having to be nonverbally active, but also turning your body away from the screen,” Bailenson said, “so that for a few minutes you are not smothered with gestures that are perceptually realistic but socially meaningless.”

University, S. (2021, February 23). Four causes for ‘Zoom fatigue’ and their solutions. Stanford News. https://news.stanford.edu/2021/02/23/four-causes-zoom-fatigue-solutions/

Practice Considerations for Teaching in an Online Environment

No surprise, research and practices are beginning to roll in about online teaching and learning.  In a recent edition of CBE – Life Sciences Education (LSE) research and best practices were shared around teaching equitably in synchronous online classes (Reinholz et al., 2020).  While Extension teaching is non-formal, a quick review of the article will likely affirm and may help to inspire inclusive and equitable teaching practices.

Research indicates that instructors have adopted a range of practices to promote equitable participation online. Key practices related to social presence, teaching presence, and cognitive presence include: 1) (re)-establishing norms, 2) using participant names, 3) using breakout rooms, 4) leveraging chat-based participation, 5) using polling software, 6) creating an inclusive curriculum, and 7) cutting content to maintain rigor.  The article shared the research approach and results.  Below are a few personal insights to the practices that relate to our collective Extension work.

Re-establishing Norms.  For some in Extension this may mean establishing norms for online teaching and learning.  There is comfort for participants knowing what to expect, how they will be welcomed and how they will communicate in the session.  For example – do you want participants to have cameras on if they can?  Should they raise their hand or use chat to converse?  Will you use annotation tools?  Talk about your expectations, practice them within your group, revisit your group practice…it is mostly about making others conformable and feeling welcomed.

Using Student Names.  Distance education does not have to be socially distant (what a concept!).  Research indicates, and I bet your human experience may feel the same…people like to be called by name.  It is possible that you have not met before in person and that you may not get the pronunciation right the first time…but data suggests that trying to use names is welcoming to participants.

Use Breakout Rooms.  Zoom breakout rooms are not the answer to everything, but they can provide the one on one conversation and deeper understanding that happens with small group discussions.  If you are teaching a workshop online, and haven’t played with break-out rooms – try it!  More and more of our Extension colleagues (and participants) are becoming comfortable with using breakout rooms.

Leveraging Chat-Based Participation. The interest is in engaging your audience and helping them be present to what you are sharing.  As Reinholz shares in the article, “chat is a very flexible method for broadening participation (related to teaching presence)”.  It is simple, and accessible.  Why not ask a question and have dialogue in the chat?  Or name co-teachers to monitor the chat and respond to the questions?

Using Polling Software. There are many options available for polling, including hosting a poll within zoom.  That said, often we are hosting a meeting and are interested in creating a word cloud or other visualizations.  If you are interested in polls, know that Poll Everwhere is supported by CIT https://teaching.cornell.edu/resource/poll-everywhere For full access, complete the request form found here: https://cornell.ca1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3Qmr0bsnhijpxmR 

No doubt, polls engage the audience, and the data can be useful to you moving forward.

Creating an Inclusive Curriculum.  In a perfect world, creating a culture for inclusivity begins as you create curriculum, projects, and programs.  Use guiding principles for inclusivity as you prepare core content, workshop announcements, etc.  Consider adding information about your approach to inclusivity to your website and resources.  I don’t know about you, but this is one I need to work on :).

Cutting Content to Maintain Rigor. As Reinholz et al. have shared, “Instructors noted the lack of time in moving online”.  That sentiment goes for students as well.  Students share that it can feel overwhelming to have to read, watch, and communicate in an online environment.  Too much information is not a new challenge to Extension staff – we get excited!  The practice of cutting content is intended to share the critical content for participants to help you as the instructor to meet your objectives.  Good to keep this in mind and possibly sharing “recommended readings”.

 

Reinholz, D. L., Stone-Johnstone, A., White, I., Sianez Jr, L. M., & Shah, N. (2020). A Pandemic Crash Course: Learning to Teach Equitably in Synchronous Online Classes. CBE—Life Sciences Education19(4), ar60. https://www.lifescied.org/doi/10.1187/cbe.20-06-0126

 

 

Help for Lambda Chapter History Project Needed

This January Chapter Historian Ave Bauder will embark on compiling the story of the Lamda Chapter of ESP. Although we have located a miscellaneous box containing various materials, nothing beats information from people who have been involved in ESP over the years. Were you a chapter officer once? Around for the 1st meeting or the early years? Presented at a National Conference? Have some incriminating pictures? If so, Ave wants to talk with you! We are especially hoping that some of our Lifetime members can help us reconstruct the history of the Chapter. If you have any information or stories that you think will be helpful, please contact Ave at Bauder@Cornell.edu or 315-651-0050.

From our ESP Lambda Chapter President (October 2020) – Arlene Wilson

This year has been full of challenges, as we were swept up in the middle of a worldwide pandemic. Cornell Cooperative Extension has encouraged us providing ways to live our mission of cooperation and partnership with government, farmers, growers, volunteers and the community. We have worked even harder, dug deep into the well of creativity, stretched more to demonstrate our flexibility, transitioned to online platforms [sometimes kicking and screaming] and working remotely, wearing face coverings, and carrying hand sanitizer everywhere. We have been appreciated, thanked, praised, and received support from a variety of sectors.

To whom much is given, much is expected.

The role of Epsilon Sigma Phi, is one of fostering excellence in the Extension professional through professional development and leadership opportunities. We do this through online workshops, seminars and our flagship in person Annual ESP Conference. Three years of planning, promotion, logo designs, trips and tours were overruled by COVID-19.

To whom much is given, much is expected.

So, we pivoted and decided to host the first ESP Virtual Conference! We retooled plans, repurposed logos and rallied the Extension troops across New York State and on the Cornell campus to make the concept a reality. There are not words enough to thank everyone for all the creativity, tenacity, problem-solving, and hard work, resulting in a highly successful, record-breaking ESP national conference! Stay tuned for more innovation and projects from ESP!

Warmly,

Arlene Wilson, ESP Lambda President
aaw66@cornell.edu

Membership Update (October 2020)

Membership Update:

ESP-Lambda keeps on growing, with our current membership standing at 59 members — 37 annual members and 22 life members. Joining us in 2020 are: Robert Batt, Liz Berkeley, Mary Breyette, Susan Coyle, Jarmila Haseler, Lori Koenick, Jessica Kouzan, Andrea Lista, Garet Livermore, Susanne Magee, MaryBeth Mitcham, Lydia Reidy, Jessica Reid, and Nicole Slevin. Welcome to all!

Stay up to date on ESP happenings and communicate with your peers across the state on the ESP-Lambda Chapter Blog: https://blogs-dev.cornell.edu/esp-lambda/ You’ll find information about the ESP-Lambda book club and professional development opportunities, as well as find a forum to discuss topics of interest with your fellow Extension professionals.

$upport Available to Attend Virtual Annual Conference

https://cceconferences.wufoo.com/forms/esp-national-conference-request-for-upport/

What is ESP – we will give you $50 to find out!

Submitted by: Beth Claypoole, CCE Wayne County, NYS and National ESP Past President

One of the best ways to take advantage of national learning opportunities and get to know your extension colleagues is to join one of the national extension associations – and I am recommending Epsilon Sigma Phi.  ESP is a national organization that fosters leadership and professional development across all extension technical areas of expertise – all members of extension have a place in ESP.  I once said that ESP teaches you how to be a better educator, no matter what area of technical expertise.  This is especially important for extension staff who may not have a readily prominent professional organization to which to belong – like Executive Directors!

This year, our local NYS ESP Chapter, Lambda, was going to host the National ESP 2020 Conference, in Rochester, NY, expecting more than 200 people to visit our state and participate in Professional Development activities.  Instead, we are in the process of planning our on line conference, complete with 5 concurrent sessions, 2 speakers, and our traditional Ruby Award presentation.  The Ruby Award is the highest level of achievement reached by an ESP member and the awardee gives a heartfelt motivational speech during the Ruby Awards luncheon.

Our 3 speakers this year are worth the registration price, just to hear their presentations:  Dr. Sonny Ramaswamy, past Director of NIFA (National Institute of Food and Agriculture) – the part of the USDA to which Extension reports; Ruby Award winner Iowa State University President Wendy Wintersteen; and Jonathan Ntheketha, Associate Director Student Success and Engagement, Multicultural Center for Academic Success, Diversity and Inclusion – RIT (Rochester Institute of Technology).  Each of these speakers will have us thinking and taking action to better our extension experiences for ourselves and our participants.

In addition to these 3 outstanding speakers, we also have additional seminar presentations, research presentations, Ignite speakers and poster presentations from more than 40 of your colleagues from across the nation, including several from CCE.

The ESP association and conference websites can be found by going to “espnational.org” and clicking on the virtual conference link. Your local Lambda chapter Board of Directors welcomes you to register for this on line event for just $100.  And to help you with your registration, the board approved at its August meeting to reimburse all current ESP members $50 of the registration fee.  In addition, up to 20 new/potential members will also receive a $50 reimbursement through ESP – Lambda Chapter.  You will need to register up front and pay the entire amount.  Please contact Beth Claypoole, eac9@cornell.edu,  for more information and to get registered for the first 20 non-member registrations.

Bite-sized Learning

brain is explodingDesigning instruction and being a learner in an audience or class, working to learn new things, are flip sides of the same coin.  Learning is the intended outcome – but achieving that goal can be tricky.

Were you ever a student or a participant in a class or a training (online or otherwise) that left you feeling too “full”, or confused? Or perhaps it left you reviewing the lesson 2, 3 or 4 times so that you could better understand what was presented?  That feeling, referred to as cognitive overload, is real – your brain just can’t handle that much information.

Our job as educators in Extension is often to take complex ideas or research and translate it into information that anyone can understand…yet it is easy to get caught up in academic jargon or the details, leaving our learners frustrated or the learning outcome unmet.

multimedia = words + pictures (a strategy for promoting transfer of knowledge).

Research indicates that using words and pictures together is an important strategy for providing instruction that promotes deep learning and a transfer of knowledge.  Drs. Ruth Clark and Richard Mayer, in their book e-Learning and the science of instruction, describe e-learning multimedia as a combination of text and audio as well as still and motion visuals to communicate content.

These ideas, which may seem like just good common sense, are also grounded in science and research.  They go on to describe a list of multimedia principles that are intended to help avoid cognitive overload and help learners more easily grasp complex issues.   I’m going to be writing about those principles on our ESP blog and will feature the segmenting principle in this post.

The segmenting principle suggests that breaking a complex lesson down from one large lesson into smaller, more manageable segments can help a learner to more easily understand a lesson. Breaking a big idea down into smaller buckets of content is much like what we would do if we were preparing a course, module or presentation outline.

Clark and Mayer also suggest presenting the ideas one at a time, with a mental break in between to allow for the learner to digest the concept.   More time with one concept equates to time for pushing  ideas around in your working memory,  giving you a chance to relate the concept to prior knowledge.

Idea + Pause + Idea + Pause = Greater Cognition and Retention

Can you think of a time when you have participated in an training or lesson set up this way?

More for those of us developing online learning experiences:
  • Learner-controlled start and stop:  In a study by Schar and Zimmermann (2007) two groups were compared: one watching a continuous animation and another watching an animation which included controls to pause the screen. Both experimental groups proved to have no difference in learning. However, the researcher team suggested that when the animation didn’t have pre-chosen points to stop, the learner didn’t know to make the decision to stop.  To be more successful, the lesson designer might be more intentional, inserting auto-pauses at points that make logical sense.
  • Learner-controlled learning: In another study, Mayer, Mathias, and Wetzell (2002) presented some learners with a labeled diagram while others were presented with an interactive diagram where if click on the different part, a short summary was read. The students who used the narrated segmented training did better on their performance tests than those who did not.

Worth the effort?  Why invest the time to carry out the segmenting principle?  Poorly designed instruction wastes time and money.  We want to help participants understand what they are being taught, learn new skills and grow in confidence.  Research shows that the segmenting principle is a successful method to design instruction of complex issues.

Reflecting on the segmenting principle:  How will you use these ideas to plan your next educational program?